![]() The reason the new version was released was to fix problems. With Waves for instance, you can't run the new version and the old version on the same computer at the same time. It is not acceptable to rely on older versions of software long term. ![]() but as I say, although it's frustrating not to be able to use the new plugins, let's not forget the older version works "as is". All I'm curious to know is whose hands this issue is in - does Acid need to be updated, but it just hasn't been updated in time for the Waves release, or is there something so odd about the waveshell that means it'll never ever work with Acid? The latter seems unlikely, given that the waveshell works ok with SF and Vegas. I asked Waves if they could give any indication as to whether they will support Acid again in the future, and they said they 'honestly don't know' at this time. I can understand why CDA would be dropped, since it is DX only, but of course Acid works fine with many other VST plugins. What's very odd, though, is that SF and Vegas are supported by this new Waves release. The older version of Waves still works perfectly with Acid "as is", so I'm happy.up to a point. Well, it isn't exactly "hell" - we're only talking about plugins, after all, even if they are expensive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |